Revert "First-class GitHub team reviews"

This commit is contained in:
Wolfgang Walther 2025-10-28 07:38:20 +00:00 committed by GitHub
parent c0b192e003
commit b5af85e10e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
8 changed files with 85 additions and 207 deletions

View file

@ -146,14 +146,19 @@ jobs:
- name: Requesting maintainer reviews
if: ${{ steps.app-token.outputs.token }}
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ steps.app-token.outputs.token }}
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
APP_GH_TOKEN: ${{ steps.app-token.outputs.token }}
REPOSITORY: ${{ github.repository }}
ORG_ID: ${{ github.repository_owner_id }}
NUMBER: ${{ github.event.number }}
AUTHOR: ${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }}
# Don't request reviewers on draft PRs
DRY_MODE: ${{ github.event.pull_request.draft && '1' || '' }}
run: result/bin/request-maintainers-reviews.sh "$ORG_ID" "$REPOSITORY" "$NUMBER" "$AUTHOR" comparison
run: |
# maintainers.json contains GitHub IDs. Look up handles to request reviews from.
# There appears to be no API to request reviews based on GitHub IDs
jq -r 'keys[]' comparison/maintainers.json \
| while read -r id; do gh api /user/"$id" --jq .login; done \
| GH_TOKEN="$APP_GH_TOKEN" result/bin/request-reviewers.sh "$REPOSITORY" "$NUMBER" "$AUTHOR"
- name: Log current API rate limits (app-token)
if: ${{ steps.app-token.outputs.token }}

View file

@ -179,12 +179,8 @@ runCommand "compare"
jq
cmp-stats
];
maintainers = builtins.toJSON maintainers.users;
teams = builtins.toJSON maintainers.teams;
passAsFile = [
"maintainers"
"teams"
];
maintainers = builtins.toJSON maintainers;
passAsFile = [ "maintainers" ];
}
''
mkdir $out
@ -227,5 +223,4 @@ runCommand "compare"
fi
cp "$maintainersPath" "$out/maintainers.json"
cp "$teamsPath" "$out/teams.json"
''

View file

@ -51,16 +51,15 @@ let
# updates to .json files.
# TODO: Support by-name package sets.
filenames = lib.optional (lib.length path == 1) "pkgs/by-name/${sharded (lib.head path)}/";
# meta.maintainers also contains all individual team members.
# We only want to ping individuals if they're added individually as maintainers, not via teams.
maintainers = package.meta.nonTeamMaintainers or [ ];
teams = package.meta.teams or [ ];
# TODO: Refactor this so we can ping entire teams instead of the individual members.
# Note that this will require keeping track of GH team IDs in "maintainers/teams.nix".
maintainers = package.meta.maintainers or [ ];
}
))
# No need to match up packages without maintainers with their files.
# This also filters out attributes where `packge = null`, which is the
# case for libintl, for example.
(lib.filter (pkg: pkg.maintainers != [ ] || pkg.teams != [ ]))
(lib.filter (pkg: pkg.maintainers != [ ]))
];
relevantFilenames =
@ -95,43 +94,20 @@ let
attrsWithModifiedFiles = lib.filter (pkg: anyMatchingFiles pkg.filenames) attrsWithFilenames;
userPings =
listToPing = lib.concatMap (
pkg:
map (maintainer: {
type = "user";
user = toString maintainer.githubId;
id = maintainer.githubId;
inherit (maintainer) github;
packageName = pkg.name;
});
teamPings =
pkg: team:
if team ? github then
[
{
type = "team";
team = toString team.githubId;
packageName = pkg.name;
}
]
else
userPings pkg team.members;
maintainersToPing = lib.concatMap (
pkg: userPings pkg pkg.maintainers ++ lib.concatMap (teamPings pkg) pkg.teams
dueToFiles = pkg.filenames;
}) pkg.maintainers
) attrsWithModifiedFiles;
byType = lib.groupBy (ping: ping.type) maintainersToPing;
byMaintainer = lib.groupBy (ping: toString ping.id) listToPing;
byUser = lib.pipe (byType.user or [ ]) [
(lib.groupBy (ping: ping.user))
(lib.mapAttrs (_user: lib.map (pkg: pkg.packageName)))
];
byTeam = lib.pipe (byType.team or [ ]) [
(lib.groupBy (ping: ping.team))
(lib.mapAttrs (_team: lib.map (pkg: pkg.packageName)))
];
packagesPerMaintainer = lib.mapAttrs (
maintainer: packages: map (pkg: pkg.packageName) packages
) byMaintainer;
in
{
users = byUser;
teams = byTeam;
}
packagesPerMaintainer

View file

@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ stdenvNoCC.mkDerivation {
./get-code-owners.sh
./request-reviewers.sh
./request-code-owner-reviews.sh
./request-maintainers-reviews.sh
];
};
nativeBuildInputs = [ makeWrapper ];
@ -27,7 +26,6 @@ stdenvNoCC.mkDerivation {
for bin in *.sh; do
mv "$bin" "$out/bin"
wrapProgram "$out/bin/$bin" \
--set PAGER cat \
--set PATH ${
lib.makeBinPath [
coreutils

View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Get the code owners of the files changed by a PR, returning one GitHub user/team handle per line
# Get the code owners of the files changed by a PR, returning one username per line
set -euo pipefail
@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ log "This PR touches ${#touchedFiles[@]} files"
# remove code owners to avoid pinging them
git -C "$gitRepo" show "$baseRef":"$ownersFile" > "$tmp"/codeowners
# Associative array with the user/team as the key for easy de-duplication
# Associative array with the user as the key for easy de-duplication
# Make sure to always lowercase keys to avoid duplicates with different casings
declare -A finalOwners=()
declare -A users=()
for file in "${touchedFiles[@]}"; do
result=$(codeowners --file "$tmp"/codeowners "$file")
@ -59,9 +59,39 @@ for file in "${touchedFiles[@]}"; do
# The first regex match is everything after the @
entry=${BASH_REMATCH[1]}
finalOwners[${entry,,}]=
if [[ "$entry" =~ (.*)/(.*) ]]; then
# Teams look like $org/$team
org=${BASH_REMATCH[1]}
team=${BASH_REMATCH[2]}
# Instead of requesting a review from the team itself,
# we request reviews from the individual users.
# This is because once somebody from a team reviewed the PR,
# the API doesn't expose that the team was already requested for a review,
# so we wouldn't be able to avoid rerequesting reviews
# without saving some some extra state somewhere
# We could also consider implementing a more advanced heuristic
# in the future that e.g. only pings one team member,
# but escalates to somebody else if that member doesn't respond in time.
gh api \
--cache=1h \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
-H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \
"/orgs/$org/teams/$team/members" \
--jq '.[].login' > "$tmp/team-members"
readarray -t members < "$tmp/team-members"
log "Team $entry has these members: ${members[*]}"
for user in "${members[@]}"; do
users[${user,,}]=
done
else
# Everything else is a user
users[${entry,,}]=
fi
done
done
printf "%s\n" "${!finalOwners[@]}"
printf "%s\n" "${!users[@]}"

View file

@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Requests maintainer reviews for a PR
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_DIR=$(dirname "$0")
if (( $# < 5 )); then
echo >&2 "Usage: $0 ORG_ID GITHUB_REPO PR_NUMBER AUTHOR COMPARISON_PATH"
exit 1
fi
orgId=$1
baseRepo=$2
prNumber=$3
prAuthor=$4
comparisonPath=$5
org="${baseRepo%/*}"
# maintainers.json/teams.json contains GitHub IDs. Look up handles to request reviews from.
# There appears to be no API to request reviews based on IDs
{
jq -r 'keys[]' "$comparisonPath"/maintainers.json \
| while read -r id; do
if login=$(gh api /user/"$id" --jq .login); then
echo "$login"
else
echo >&2 "Skipping user with id $id: $login"
fi
done
jq -r 'keys[]' "$comparisonPath"/teams.json \
| while read -r id; do
if slug=$(gh api /organizations/"$orgId"/team/"$id" --jq .slug); then
echo "$org/$slug"
else
echo >&2 "Skipping team with id $id: $slug"
fi
done
} | "$SCRIPT_DIR"/request-reviewers.sh "$baseRepo" "$prNumber" "$prAuthor"

View file

@ -1,16 +1,8 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Request reviewers for a PR, reading line-separated usernames/teams on stdin,
# Request reviewers for a PR, reading line-separated usernames on stdin,
# filtering for valid reviewers before using the API endpoint to request reviews:
# https://docs.github.com/en/rest/pulls/review-requests?apiVersion=2022-11-28#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request
#
# Example:
# $ request-reviewers.sh NixOS/nixpkgs 123456 someUser <<-EOF
# someUser
# anotherUser
# NixOS/someTeam
# NixOS/anotherTeam
# EOF
set -euo pipefail
@ -38,133 +30,59 @@ baseRepo=$1
prNumber=$2
prAuthor=$3
org="${baseRepo%/*}"
repo="${baseRepo#*/}"
tmp=$(mktemp -d)
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' exit
declare -A users=() teams=()
declare -A users=()
while read -r handle && [[ -n "$handle" ]]; do
if [[ "$handle" =~ (.*)/(.*) ]]; then
if [[ "${BASH_REMATCH[1]}" != "$org" ]]; then
log "Team $handle is not part of the $org org, ignoring"
else
teams[${BASH_REMATCH[2],,}]=
fi
else
users[${handle,,}]=
fi
done
log "Checking users: ${!users[*]}"
log "Checking teams: ${!teams[*]}"
# Cannot request a review from the author
if [[ -v users[${prAuthor,,}] ]]; then
log "Avoiding review request for PR author $prAuthor"
log "One or more files are owned by the PR author, ignoring"
unset 'users[${prAuthor,,}]'
fi
# And we don't want to rerequest reviews from people or teams who already reviewed
log -e "Checking if users/teams have already reviewed the PR"
# shellcheck disable=SC2016
# A graphql query to get all reviewers of a PR, including both users and teams
# on behalf of which a review was done.
# The REST API doesn't have an end-point for figuring out the on-behalfness of reviews
all_reviewers_query='
query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!, $endCursor: String) {
repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) {
pullRequest(number: $pr) {
reviews(first: 100, after: $endCursor) {
nodes {
author {
login
}
onBehalfOf(first: 100) {
nodes {
slug
}
}
}
pageInfo {
hasNextPage
endCursor
}
}
}
}
}
'
gh api graphql \
gh api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
--paginate \
-f query="$all_reviewers_query" \
-F owner="$org" \
-F repo="$repo" \
-F pr="$prNumber" \
> "$tmp/already-reviewed-by-response"
-H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \
"/repos/$baseRepo/pulls/$prNumber/reviews" \
--jq '.[].user.login' > "$tmp/already-reviewed-by"
readarray -t userReviewers < <(jq -r '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviews.nodes[].author.login' "$tmp/already-reviewed-by-response")
log "PR is already reviewed by these users: ${userReviewers[*]}"
for user in "${userReviewers[@]}"; do
# And we don't want to rerequest reviews from people who already reviewed
while read -r user; do
if [[ -v users[${user,,}] ]]; then
log "Avoiding review request for user $user, who has already left a review"
log "User $user is a potential reviewer, but has already left a review, ignoring"
unset 'users[${user,,}]'
fi
done
readarray -t teamReviewers < <(jq -r '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviews.nodes[].onBehalfOf.nodes[].slug' "$tmp/already-reviewed-by-response")
log "PR is already reviewed by these teams: ${teamReviewers[*]}"
for team in "${teamReviewers[@]}"; do
if [[ -v teams[${team,,}] ]]; then
log "Avoiding review request for team $team, who has already left a review"
unset 'teams[${team,,}]'
fi
done
log -e "Checking that all users/teams can be requested for review"
done < "$tmp/already-reviewed-by"
for user in "${!users[@]}"; do
if ! gh api "/repos/$baseRepo/collaborators/$user" >&2; then
log "User $user cannot be requested for review because they don't exist or are not a repository collaborator, ignoring. Probably missed the automated invite to the maintainers team (see <https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/234293>)"
if ! gh api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
-H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \
"/repos/$baseRepo/collaborators/$user" >&2; then
log "User $user is not a repository collaborator, probably missed the automated invite to the maintainers team (see <https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/234293>), ignoring"
unset 'users[$user]'
fi
done
for team in "${!teams[@]}"; do
if ! gh api "/orgs/$org/teams/$team/repos/$baseRepo" >&2; then
log "Team $team cannot be requested for review because it doesn't exist or has no repository permissions, ignoring. Probably wasn't added to the nixpkgs-maintainers team (see https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/tree/master/maintainers#maintainer-teams)"
unset 'teams[$team]'
fi
done
log "Would request reviews from users: ${!users[*]}"
log "Would request reviews from teams: ${!teams[*]}"
if (( ${#users[@]} + ${#teams[@]} > 10 )); then
log "Too many reviewers (users: ${!users[*]}, teams: ${!teams[*]}), skipping review requests"
if [[ "${#users[@]}" -gt 10 ]]; then
log "Too many reviewers (${!users[*]}), skipping review requests"
exit 0
fi
for user in "${!users[@]}"; do
log "Requesting review from user $user"
if ! response=$(effect gh api \
--method POST \
"/repos/$baseRepo/pulls/$prNumber/requested_reviewers" \
-f "reviewers[]=$user"); then
log "Failed to request review from user $user: $response"
fi
done
log "Requesting review from: $user"
for team in "${!teams[@]}"; do
log "Requesting review from team $team"
if ! response=$(effect gh api \
if ! response=$(jq -n --arg user "$user" '{ reviewers: [ $user ] }' | \
effect gh api \
--method POST \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
-H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \
"/repos/$baseRepo/pulls/$prNumber/requested_reviewers" \
-f "team_reviewers[]=$team"); then
log "Failed to request review from team $team: $response"
--input -); then
log "Failed to request review from $user: $response"
fi
done

View file

@ -397,7 +397,6 @@ let
];
sourceProvenance = listOf attrs;
maintainers = listOf (attrsOf any); # TODO use the maintainer type from lib/tests/maintainer-module.nix
nonTeamMaintainers = listOf (attrsOf any); # TODO use the maintainer type from lib/tests/maintainer-module.nix
teams = listOf (attrsOf any); # TODO similar to maintainers, use a teams type
priority = int;
pkgConfigModules = listOf str;
@ -671,10 +670,6 @@ let
maintainers =
attrs.meta.maintainers or [ ] ++ concatMap (team: team.members or [ ]) attrs.meta.teams or [ ];
# Needed for CI to be able to avoid requesting reviews from individual
# team members
nonTeamMaintainers = attrs.meta.maintainers or [ ];
identifiers =
let
# nix-env writes a warning for each derivation that has null in its meta values, so